Hey everyone!
A quick note before diving in - we're thrilled by the response to Scale Premium so far! To those who've already subscribed, thank you for your support and we’re excited to have you onboard.
For our readers who haven't made the jump yet, you still have 1 week left to claim your first month for free here. All our regular content will remain free, but Premium offers deeper insights we think you'll love.
Now, let's get into this week's edition!
We've spent over 50 hours discussing the most important topics for founders and investors - and one thing keeps coming up: don't f&*k up hiring!
This week, we're deep diving into what to look out for when making your first hires.
Whether you're bootstrapping or have raised from the likes of Sequoia and a16z, building a successful business begins with making the right foundational hires. You need to be able to identify what makes '10x' talent (yes, it's kind of cheesy but it works).
After interviewing dozens of successful founders and investors, we've identified 3 qualities that consistently appear in transformative first hires.
Increase the output of your sales team without buying more tools or hiring new SDRs. Onboard Agent Frank, Salesforge’s AI SDR, to fully automate prospecting, personalized outreach and booking meetings while your team focuses on closing deals. Get a personalised email from Agent Frank to see his work in action:
Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who help keep this newsletter free
The most consistent pattern across successful early hires is that they actually care about their work.
(Special shoutout to the Severance fans who understand this gif)
It may sound obvious, but finding someone who views their job as more than just a 9-5 is surprisingly rare. This quality has been highlighted repeatedly by founders like Anish Dhar, CEO of Cortex (our feature).
What Anish calls "a deep care about your craft" goes far beyond technical competence or experience:
"People who really, really care about their work can dive into the details at a really deep level, articulate what went well and didn't go well, and have done their retrospective on what they would have done differently"
You can test for this quality during interviews by:
Starting with open-ended questions about past experience, then diving deeper with "why" and "how" follow-ups. Are they thinking critically about their actions, or just following instructions from supervisors?
Asking candidates to provide a detailed retrospective on past work. Can they honestly assess their decisions and articulate what they'd do differently now?
Looking for people who take genuine pride in their achievements. Do their eyes light up when discussing past projects?
This approach identifies candidates who will take ownership and drive excellence without constant supervision. For early-stage startups with limited resources, this intrinsic motivation is invaluable.
When interviewing, you need to make sure that you balance structured case studies with open-ended questions about personal experiences to assess this trait in candidates.
Early-stage startups are always going through periods of change. There is never stability.
Several founders, including Will Sealy of Summer (our feature), emphasized looking for candidates that are comfortable with this discomfort and uncertainty.
"I needed to find people who could help scale an enterprise software platform in uncharted territory. Being comfortable with ambiguity and rapid changes in direction was non-negotiable"
We've seen that this quality manifests as:
Ability to thrive without structure as early employees often work without defined processes or documentation. Finding 'go-getters' who can structure their own day to solve ambiguous tasks is key.
Emotional stability during setbacks. The ability to recover quickly from inevitable startup disappointments - this is far more important than people typically give it credit for.
Resourcefulness - Finding creative solutions when resources are tight, as VC cash isn't always flooding through the doors.
Testing for this quality requires going beyond hypothetical interview questions and case studies.
Sequoia's recommendation for how to truly test for this is through a 1-2 week paid trial period.
This approach is quite different from traditional recruiting. By putting candidates in the role for a few weeks, founders can get a much better sense of whether the candidate can actually navigate uncertainty, prioritize effectively without guidance, and maintain productivity during chaotic periods (but you need to make sure that you plan this well!).
PS: you can learn more about how Sequoia thinks about trial weeks here.
The best investors need the information that matters, fast.
That’s why a lot of them (including investors from a16z, Bessemer, Founders Fund, and Sequoia) trust this free newsletter.
It’s a five minute-read every morning, and it gives readers the information they need ASAP so they can spend less time scrolling and more time doing.
Founders often rely too much on finding candidates with the "right" background. The ability to learn quickly outweighs past experiences.
Thomas Njeru made this discovery when scaling Pula (our feature):
"We initially hired for experience, but quickly realized that was wrong. The most successful team members weren't those who had done similar things before, but those who could absorb new information and adapt faster than anyone else"
This 'learning velocity' became Pula's competitive advantage as they expanded into new markets where regulatory environments, farming practices, and customer needs varied dramatically.
"Someone might know everything about insurance in Kenya, but nothing about farming in Zambia. The key is how quickly they can close that gap"
Pula now explicitly tests for learning velocity during their hiring process through:
Knowledge acquisition tests: Giving candidates unfamiliar concepts to learn and explain that are completely unrelated to African ag-tech
Finding candidates that are always learning: Discussing how candidates have taught themselves new skills during interviews
Comfort with being wrong: Assessing how candidates respond when their assumptions are challenged (even when it feels like you're just being devil's advocate)
For our readers who haven't made the jump yet, you still have 1 week left to claim your first month for free here. All our regular content will remain free, but Premium offers deeper insights we think you'll love.
Building a team is difficult.
It is a stressful process where you are betting on your ability to find and attract the top 1% of the talent pool.
Based on our conversations with some of the world's best founders and investors, we believe that there are 3 traits that set these candidates apart that you need to keep an eye out for:
Love of the game: Look for people who demonstrate genuine passion for their craft, who can articulate detailed perspectives on their work, and who take ownership without supervision.
Comfort with discomfort: Prioritize candidates who thrive in ambiguity, maintain emotional stability during setbacks, and find creative solutions with limited resources.
Fast learners: Value learning velocity over experience, seeking people who can rapidly adapt to new contexts, constantly develop new skills, and remain open to having their assumptions challenged.
Always remember Thomas Njeru's golden rule: "Hiring the wrong person is so dangerous... getting it right takes time, and if you're not careful, that's what will kill the company."
If you enjoyed this issue, please share it with fellow founders and operators. Have questions about hiring? Reach out at [email protected].
If you enjoyed this issue, please share it with fellow founders, operators, & investors and fill out our feedback form below:
What did you think of this edition? |
See you next week!
Rahul & Aryaman
Reply