Hey guys! Over the past few months we’ve interviewed dozens of the world’s best growth-stage founders, and we’ve noticed a pattern: even the most successful entrepreneurs fall prey to similar blind spots.
These aren't just minor oversights, but significant missteps that often determined the trajectory that their business took for the next few years, and were (often!) very expensive and time consuming to repair.
Here we’re going to be referencing 3 founders we’ve interviewed:
Travis Pittman from TourRadar, the world’s largest organized adventure platform
Baris Ozaydinli from Scooch, UK’s leading pet health subscription platform
Thomas Njeru from Pula, Africa’s leading agri-insurtech player, across 22 countries and 2m farmers
Let’s get into it!
For our readers who haven't made the jump yet, you still have 1 week left to claim your first month for free here. All our regular content will remain free, but Premium offers deeper insights we think you'll love.
When entrepreneurs start building, they naturally gravitate toward problems they find the most interesting, or ones that they are best suited to solve, but many times those problems aren’t at the core of what they’re trying to achieve.
Let’s explain with an example.
Travis from TourRadar had a disastrous trip to Croatia where his group arrived with no transfer arrangements despite paying $5,000 upfront.
He and his brother learnt the numerous problems with tour bookings: lack of 24/7 support, trust issues with money transfers, and no chargeback capabilities.
Instead of tackling these directly, they built a social platform for tour operators. The results were predictably underwhelming…
"The thing that looks the hardest is probably what you're going to have to solve to actually make it work… Don't keep putting that off, try to be smart and tackle it from different directions. Take that front on because you have to do it at some stage"
For TourRadar, this meant building a direct booking model where users would trust the platform enough to put down thousands of dollars for international travel.
Once they pivoted to this approach in 2013, the business took off like wildfire. They most recently raised a $50m series C backed by TCV.
The Fix: Identify what the problem you’re solving is first, sounds obvious but founders often have a disconnect between the problem they want to solve and the solution they come up with.
The best investors need the information that matters, fast.
That’s why a lot of them (including investors from a16z, Bessemer, Founders Fund, and Sequoia) trust this free newsletter.
It’s a five minute-read every morning, and it gives readers the information they need ASAP so they can spend less time scrolling and more time doing.
At the very start of any business, there’s enough to worry about. Start-up wisdom often leans on the fact that the business will lose money in any case for the first few years, so profitability isn’t what you need to think about on day 0.
This problem is especially true for hyper-competitive industries, where “scale” (not us, being large) is where profitability starts to trickle in.
Baris Ozaydinli had already been burnt making this mistake before at his previous venture, Fitwell (an AI-powered fitness coaching app):
"We got to a stage with a great app that people loved but we just couldn’t make the numbers work. Getting more users would increase top-line, but if you just can’t manage the costs after that, it will never work"
This experience made him hyper-focused on unit economics with Scooch from day one.
There were a few things they were solving for, not just building solid unit economics, but also being in a position where they could predict and manage cash flows really well. This obviously lead to them becoming a subscription business.
Travis from TourRadar similarly fell into the "grow at all costs" mentality prevalent in 2018-2019.
One striking example was their addiction to providing discount codes, where they’d just give away 20% discounts on trips, because it worked well in one campaign.
They realised that the price elasticity for their user wasn’t actually that high, and taking away the 20% discount didn’t impact revenues at all… They were just giving away 20% of their bottom line for nothing.
The Fix: Get an understanding of your unit economics from day 0. Questions to understand at scale and inception are: How much can we charge our user? How much does it cost to service them? How much can we acquire them for? Basic questions, but the assumptions you make to get to the answer will be the difference between Fitwell and success.
No, it's not Nvidia... It's Mode Mobile, 2023’s fastest-growing software company according to Deloitte.
Just as Uber turned vehicles into income-generating assets, Mode is turning smartphones into an easy passive income source, already helping 45M+ users earn $325M+ through simple, everyday use.
They’ve just been granted their stock ticker by the Nasdaq, and you can still invest in their pre-IPO offering at just $0.26/share.
All three founders emphasized that scaling too quickly - particularly in hiring - can be devastating.
Thomas Njeru of Pula described how after Series A funding, they had a gung-ho attitude towards getting more revenue in.
To get going, he hired a Chief Revenue Officer who quickly brought on 15 commercial people to start scaling up the sales efforts. However, this hire hadn’t worked in a position like this and didn’t realise the systems and processes that are needed prior to hiring a sales team.
As a result, most of them just ended up sitting around executing only what came along sporadically, or what the existing team had cobbled together.
"Our office, our team was growing super fast, but not our revenue... we had to make a lot of changes, clean up and then start again," Thomas shared. "Hiring the wrong person is so dangerous."
The Fix: Focus on timing. Stage-employee fit is everything. Not only do you need them at that stage, but are they the right type of employee for that point in the business?
The journey from startup to scale-up inevitably involves mistakes. The difference between success and failure often comes down to how quickly founders recognize their blind spots and adjust course.
At the core of this is a simple idea: don’t lose the forest for the trees. You need to have a clear vision of what the business will look like in 5 yrs, or 10 yrs from today both from a product and financial perspective, and ask yourself: is everything I’m doing in service of that goal?
If not, it’s likely a mistake.
Do you have experience with these or other founder blind spots? We'd love to hear from you. And if you're currently facing any of these challenges and would like to connect with other founders who've overcome them, reply to this email and we'll facilitate an introduction.
What did you think of this edition? |
See you next week!
Rahul & Aryaman
Reply